A policy of deeming all assessments in languages other than the dominant one as unsatisfactory creates a rigid standard where diverse linguistic skills are not recognized. For example, a multilingual student demonstrating proficiency in their native language might be unfairly penalized if that language isn’t considered within the assessment framework. This approach negates the value of multilingualism and can discourage language acquisition.
Evaluating linguistic competence solely based on adherence to a single language standard can have detrimental effects on individuals and communities. It can limit opportunities for those proficient in languages other than the dominant one, hindering access to education, employment, and civic participation. Historically, such policies have been used to suppress minority languages and cultures, promoting assimilation and undermining linguistic diversity. Recognizing and valuing multilingualism, on the other hand, can enrich society by fostering cross-cultural understanding, promoting inclusivity, and expanding access to global perspectives.
